| |
Subject |
Author |
Date Posted |
Forum
|
 |
RE: GPR 1200
I only had it on good authority to make the carb or EFI change from people who have done it before, but I suspect those people may have either had modded crafts or were just meticulous in their switch from injection to premix. I guess it's possible that you may not need to do it, and that it would just mean a few more fouled plugs a season but I'm not 100% sure. It was more of a better safe than sorry remark. If you haven't heard of it, check out greenhulk.net and post that question there in the 2 stroke section of the Yamaha forums, you'll be sure to get a fully informed reply.
|
Moabmonkey
|
08/12/08 08:16am |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: GPR 1200
Unless you're using very expensive oil like Amsoil Dominator on a modded ski use a 32:1 mix including the break in period of the rebuilt cylinder.
Few other things in case you were unaware: Make sure to zip tie the floats on your oil sender or your ski will give you alarms. And remember that any time that you premix you are leaning out the ski, so make sure to compensate by opening up your carb adjustors or add more fuel thru the EFI controller. I would also keep extra plugs with you because if you spend long times idling on a premix you can foul the plugs because oil injection varies your ratio at different RPMs and now you'll be at a constant 32:1.
Not sure if there's anything specific that causes what happens - could be a line coming off, could be a manufacturing defect, could be inferior oil...
|
Moabmonkey
|
08/11/08 09:35am |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: 2003 Yamaha XL700
There's nothing wrong with Yamaha or that model, it would really come down to the way it was treated and maintained and whether it's going to suit your individual needs.
Your other post said you wanted a 3-seater so I assume you may want to tow tubes or skiers which it will do although as a skier myself, it doesn't do the latter very well in my opinion with only an 80 hp motor. I would be looking for something that has at least 130.
|
Moabmonkey
|
08/04/08 08:21am |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: Idle Problem with 2006 FX Cruizer
Some things popped in my head but when I play the scenarios out I always go back to the fact that it only happened that one isolated time. I personally would write it off until it happens again.
I do appreciate however, stopping something before it becomes a bigger problem, but let's get as much information as we can. Was it recently serviced? Ever had any problems of any kind during your ownership? Etc...
|
Moabmonkey
|
07/02/08 08:12am |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: MUDBUG nationals radar run video !!!
I sold my 04 last year but it's still in the family. I still work on it and get to see it every weekend, etc. but it belongs to my brother-in-law, sorry.
So you think they'll stop production of the GP1300R next year and put a 1.8L 4-stroke version of the SHO in its place?
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/26/08 10:32am |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: MUDBUG nationals radar run video !!!
We don't have anything like that here (event or location). However, we do have a 30 mile long, 15 mile wide lake that only has an average depth of about 12 feet and is complete glass in the mornings so I've been able to get some great gps runs in.
Grats on the run, I've wanted a GP1300R for a long time. Only ridden one but it was a blast to ride.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 04:09pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: RXP Stage 1 kit
Nah, mostly PWCtoday, ultra150.com and skiworx.com then early last year came on to this one. I'll have to check that one out.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 03:43pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: MUDBUG nationals radar run video !!!
Sweet. Is that a full on hydrodrag event? How long has it been going on?
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 03:37pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: RXP Stage 1 kit
Oh, and I apologize for all the posts we've gone back and forth on, again I'm not trying to make enemies. Hell, this forum needs more people like you - it's not very popular. I respectfully disagree on the whole comparing thing but that one was more fun that anything, I actually enjoyed that back and forth.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 03:24pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: RXP Stage 1 kit
I've had many conversations on here just chatting about our passion for the sport. It's a forum for everything and I have had conversations on everything from bank financing and insurance to bad gas and trailers.
Hey, I totally agree if you're going to go full circle on mods that you should replace the ceramic washers if you have them. I just haven't heard of any washers going out on stock boats that are operated properly. If there is a statistic of failure on those washers that are not related to say a premature failure due to an impurtiy then of course I would say replace them. I just haven't heard anything like that, you'd think there would be a recall on something like that. Hell, my Ultra250 has already had 6 recalls for a lot less than that and my RXP-X has already had one too. :(
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 03:13pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: RXP Stage 1 kit
I apologize, I did not know they replaced the washers yet. I'm not trying to be against you Remy, it just bothers me when people put too much information or non-related information in posts that are outside what the original posters were asking for, which like I said is why I came here from PWCtoday.
I'm a huge enthusiast about PWC's. I'm the type of guy that has memorized years, models, makes, colors of every craft ever built but I'm not an expert when it comes to all motors. Yeah, I have a pretty heavily modified Ultra150 and did all the work but have avoided getting into modifying the engines on my 4-strokes.
What year did they replace the washers and what did they replace them with?
If they are steel now, why would you need to replace them with aftermarket?
Once again, I agree that people that are getting into engine modifications even if they are starting small should look at things like the clutch washers for an RXP, I never felt otherwise. But again, I look at the original poster of this thread as someone who can't even decide if he wants to do stage I, let alone beyond.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 02:40pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: sea doo rxp-x or yamaha fx sho
What's rude is to post your type of responses without actually taking in the full scope of what's going on, which is why I responded the way I did. I never said anything about you not recommending Yamaha. If you took the time to understand what was going on it was simply a statement to put the comparison of the RXP-X and the SHO into context, I could have just as easily made the same remark about the RXP-X. Yes they are in a different class because they are a 3-seater and a 2-seater but that doesn't matter if someone is in the market for a PWC and is only interested in certain features.
I read your profile the minute I saw you were a new member, I know you have 3 Yamahas. If you took the time to read mine you could really save some time.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 02:28pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: 70 mph Industry Limit
I never said I knew about it, that's why I posted the thread and I have no problem admitting that.
"I was unaware of the decade old unwritten agreement between the PWC industry and the Coast Guard." - signed Moabmonkey :P
Good to know now although I guess ultimately it doesn't matter as Remy can attest to on his 70+ mph GP1300R.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 02:13pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: RXP Stage 1 kit
I had an 04 RXP that is still in the family with zero problems (is everyone going to have the same experiences? No, but it's a fact regardless). I was merely saying that even Riva, who makes the kit we're talking about, doesn't even have it as part of the kit until Stage III. Don't act like the ceramic OEM washers are a disaster waiting to happen because they aren't or they wouldn't still be using them today. You sound like an RXP enthusiast which is great, but have some faith in the company you support. If you need to know where I get some of my information here's a snippet actually worth listening to and it comes straight from Riva: "The factory washers are prone to failure only on MODIFIED engines". There's no need to cause panic or extra expense in a guy who's just casual about modifying his craft. Learn to respond to the questions people are asking and not just throwing out your personal opinions like a bullet because I never said the Riva steel washers were worthless in every respect like you imply in your hasty responses.
I came here to escape people like you on PWCtoday and I have over 7,000 posts there. It's calm and laid back here and not everyone needs a total "gearhead" response.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 02:05pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: RXP Stage 1 kit
The clutch washers are recommended for modified engines and are not considered necessary on the RXP til stage III. If you're concerned buy some clutch washers and have the dealer or whomever replace the washers when you do your first preventative maintenance on the supercharger, just remember to replace your shaft/clutch assy at the same time (and the bearings as an upgrade if you felt like it).
The stage I kit was designed to improve your top speed, acceleration and handling but unfortunately I do not know anyone with it installed. I believe you will notice the difference but I do not think it will be a phenomenal gain. More of a question of if you have the $750 lying around to do it (plus install if you cannot perform it yourself).
The only engine mod in stage I is a less restrictive supercharger breather so I would not worry about its effect on your reliability in general. A supercharger is a highly abusable component - it needs to warm up, it needs to cool down and constant pegging of full pressure and an overall lack of proper care are going to shorten its life.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 09:15am |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: 70 mph Industry Limit
After more research I found that it was actually 65 mph, not 70 and was started by SeaDoo and the Coast Guard to get the rest of the industry to comply, which they did. If you're going to respond, at least know what you're talking about and do not just regurgitate a snippet of what you found after you googled some key words.
So yes it was with each other as well as the Coast Guard. This was also more than 9 years ago and obviously the 65 mph cap has already been exceeded as I've witnessed many of my own craft and friends craft past 65 on the GPS. Like it matters, numerous craft with the right mods can exceed 70 mph anyway and I guess anyone who wants to go faster can do so.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/25/08 08:34am |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
70 mph Industry Limit
The general manager of a SeaDoo dealership told me this weekend that all the PWC manufacturers got together for tea at some point and agreed that they would not produce a craft capable of exceeding 70 mph stock.
While this 70 mph "ruling" seems to be a reality, it doesn't seem like it was something that actually occurred. To me, the limitations of the 70 mph barrier seem to be related to something that was unnecessary to meet for. Simple power to weight ratios combined with making bigger and bigger pumps is the issue. Making the pump and craft larger is a categorical issue - after a while, if a PWC gets large enough it's no longer a PWC, it's a jet boat.
This is related to a much larger issue that's been bugging me for years. It's not necessary for the manufacturers to keep making these super craft. I would much rather buy a lighter, more maneuverable craft like an HX or a Waveblaster that simply had a smaller 4-stroke motor. The power to weight ratio and some other minor design changes would make all but make up for the differences. Everyone sells either water couches or stand-ups now with the exception of the GP-1300R and it's only a matter of time before that one becomes extinct. I predict that the industry will see the error of it's ways as they reach the practical limit of these super craft, but I sure wish they would realize it now.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/23/08 09:59am |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: sea doo rxp-x or yamaha fx sho
Yeah, I misspoke when I referred to the non-cruiser version of the SHO as a 2-seater but the context of my post was in regards to SHO, not the cruiser SHO. Let's also not forget what the original poster wanted, a comparison between those two specific models. Despite the rider capacity differences, the non-cruiser SHO will still compete in the marketplace against the RXP-X. Not to mention you can compare any PWC in creation against any other PWC, it just depends on what you're comparing. If I'm in the market for a PWC and I want something fast, and I'm not going to be taking more than one extra person or towing anything, that doesn't mean I can't look at the Yamaha. And the formed seats remark was outside my comparison and just happen to be my personal opinion in general.
It's funny, at the lake everyone tries to race me and outmaneuver me no matter what they're riding or I'm riding. Now I see how stupid I am, I should just yell to the guy on the SHO that his PWC doesn't "compare" with mine.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/20/08 05:55pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: Largest seller of PWCs
Bombardier (Sea Doo) has more than a 50% market share in the U.S. but I'm not sure about the rest of the world. This is also evident if you ever look on Ebay or the classifieds for used PWC's because the vast majority are usually Sea Doo.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/17/08 02:02pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
|
RE: sea doo rxp-x or yamaha fx sho
The performances differences between the RXP-X and SHO are minor and the capability, amenity differences between the two are minor. Since they are both large, high performance crafts, and since we're assuming it's not possible to test ride each model, you should really consider the following:
Model History: First year for the SHO, RXP has been around since 04. Even though I've purchased several first year models in my life, this really is a legitimate issue and not just about the engine. Minor recalls and design flaws are pretty annoying.
Past Experience / Preference / Brand: Have any strong feelings here?
Looks: Yamaha is pretty however it's all buttoned up, RXP-X is a tiger in my opinion and really stands out in several different ways. Most of the high end Yamahas with the cushioned formed seats really turn me off and at the lake I only see senior citizens riding them.
Price: RXP-X is a full $1K more than the SHO.
Dealership: Location, service, people to your liking?
In the end though, I love all brands including Yamaha and have owned several of them, I couldn't really think of a harsh word to say about them. Every craft is going to have it's pluses and minuses before and after you buy it.
|
Moabmonkey
|
06/12/08 04:40pm |
Watercraft News Board
|
